<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting back on the SEO Path &#8211; Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://construct.sg/blog/getting-back-on-the-seo-path-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://construct.sg/blog/getting-back-on-the-seo-path-tools/</link>
	<description>Digital Specialists to the World&#039;s Advertising Agencies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charan</title>
		<link>http://construct.sg/blog/getting-back-on-the-seo-path-tools/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Charan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://construct.sg/blog/?p=483#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nik.

I think the fundamentals of search optimisation are essentially the same on most of the search engines. So although most of the data I use to build my keywords is derived from Google - I expect the same search patterns to exist on Bing and Yahoo. Of course, one could definitely extend the research and probably find some very valuable niche terms on the other search engines, but personally having looked at the volume of traffic Bing and Yahoo send to most of our sites, I don&#039;t know if its worth the effort. For example, we have a well ranked site on all major search engines, but Yahoo and Bing collectively only send me 4% of my organic search traffic. 

Have you had a different experience? Would love to hear your ideas on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nik.</p>
<p>I think the fundamentals of search optimisation are essentially the same on most of the search engines. So although most of the data I use to build my keywords is derived from Google &#8211; I expect the same search patterns to exist on Bing and Yahoo. Of course, one could definitely extend the research and probably find some very valuable niche terms on the other search engines, but personally having looked at the volume of traffic Bing and Yahoo send to most of our sites, I don&#8217;t know if its worth the effort. For example, we have a well ranked site on all major search engines, but Yahoo and Bing collectively only send me 4% of my organic search traffic. </p>
<p>Have you had a different experience? Would love to hear your ideas on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://construct.sg/blog/getting-back-on-the-seo-path-tools/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://construct.sg/blog/?p=483#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Nice article Charan. How much of your strategy is geared towards google?  And what&#039;s your take on Bing &amp; Yahoo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Charan. How much of your strategy is geared towards google?  And what&#8217;s your take on Bing &amp; Yahoo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

